[Global Times special correspondent Lu Hao] Japan’s Kyodo News 12 reported that the Japanese government released a report, including about 670 copies on the Diaoyu Islands (Japan called Senkaku Islands) and South Korea disputed islands Dokdo (Japan called Takeshima) “new historical materials”. Japan says these historical data support the legitimacy of Japan’s sovereignty over the islands concerned”. South Korea’s Central Daily said Japan’s practice would worsen its relations with its neighbors. Japan attempted to unilaterally in the international publicity for sovereignty over Dokdo, which is bound to make is in the sensitive period of the relationship between Japan and South Korea once again “impact”. Kyodo news agency said, the Japanese government released 12 report includes about 340 about Dokdo historical data, 330 pieces of historical data on the Diaoyu islands. The announcement on the Diaoyu Islands history, including the Qing Dynasty mid eighteenth Century “not included in the Diaoyu Islands territorial scope of official map, and in 1819 the Diaoyu Islands in the Ryukyu Royal landing long field Island (history called” fish root long field island “) text description. About Dokdo historical data, including the 1951 “San Francisco peace treaty” signed, the United States government officials of South Korea will not require the island as Japanese territory denial letters. Japan said that the evidence proved “(Dokdo and Diaoyu Islands) in the international law is Japan’s inherent territory”. Japan’s Daily News said that Japan released the relevant information for the annual routine, aimed at strengthening the publicity on territorial issues”. Japan’s territorial Government, Matsumoto told reporters at 12 news conference: “Japan’s approach is to listen to the evidence of domestic and overseas podcasts.”. Future investigations into the territory will also continue.” Chinese Japan Institute of Contemporary International Relations Institute researcher Liu Junhong 12, “Global Times” reporter said, on the island of the territorial issue, Japan claims the islands as their own, do not recognize the dispute; on the other hand, continue to collect the so-called “evidence”, and the “evidence” first published. These unilateral so-called “evidence” can not be true evidence. Japan’s report is only unilateral release, and has not been recognized, there is no legal effect, but in playing “public opinion war.””.